A Duetone product
ReviewsDue
No passwords. No bidding. Just reviews. ReviewsDue runs a conference’s peer review, from the first submission to the final program.
One place for everyone in the review
For authors
Add your co-authors, have each confirm their ORCID iD, and submit. A format check shows any page-limit, margin or font issue, with how to fix it. Then receive the decision and the reviews the chairs release, and if the paper is accepted, choose who presents it.
For reviewers
Accept the invitation, choose a few of your own papers, and review the submissions you are assigned, with the paper beside the review form. Declare any conflict the checks missed, and discuss each paper with the other reviewers.
For chairs
Set up tracks, review forms, format rules and deadlines, invite your committee, run matching once submissions close, hold the TPC meeting, send decisions and build the program.
Matching without bidding
Reviewers upload a few of their own papers instead of bidding, into a personal library they can reuse in every conference, and ReviewsDue checks that they are listed as an author.
It scores how closely each reviewer’s work matches each submission, with Latent Semantic Indexing or SPECTER2 semantic embeddings, as the chairs choose, then computes an optimal assignment that respects conflicts, declined papers and every reviewer’s load limits.
Conflicts of interest, found automatically
ReviewsDue checks each committee member’s co-authorship against every paper’s authors, using public OpenAlex, Crossref and DBLP records and papers published through ReviewsDue, matched by ORCID iD. Co-authors on committee members’ signature papers are checked too.
A name or co-author name match is only a possible conflict: it goes to review and keeps no one away until it is confirmed. Authors can confirm or decline possible conflicts when they submit. Chairs triage the uncertain ones one after another, and can look up any person to see their conflicts with the evidence. A dismissal is remembered until new evidence appears. Double-blind tracks never reveal authors to committee members.
Chairs can also turn on institutional conflicts, and committee members and authors can declare a conflict with each other.
Built for large programs
Track chairs, area chairs, TPC members, reviewers and authors each get a dashboard of what is due.
No passwords, verified authors
Sign in with ORCID, a one-time email code or a passkey; ReviewsDue stores no passwords. Every author on a paper confirms their own ORCID iD before the paper can be submitted.
Who reviewed what, encrypted
Who reviewed which paper is stored only in encrypted form, under a key held for each conference. Reviews are double-blind by default.
TPC meetings, planned and run live
Seat members and papers in discussion groups, keeping conflicted members away where possible, then follow each group’s paper under discussion in a live tracker.
Late reviews, covered
Reviewers are reminded before a review is due and daily while it is late. Chairs can remind late reviewers in waves and add emergency reviewers.
Decisions sent as approved
Chairs preview each decision email from an editable template and approve it, and ReviewsDue sends exactly that content.
From accepted papers to a program
Group accepted papers into sessions, place them in a grid of days, time slots and rooms that keeps sessions with conflicting topics out of parallel slots, then publish and export.
Running a conference or workshop?
Request a conference on reviewsdue.com. It is free for up to 100 submissions, and authors and reviewers never pay.